The Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report giving details of the background to the decisions to refuse applications for Discretionary Parking Permits from 21 applicants, who had subsequently appealed against these decisions.

Resolved -

(1)     That, with regard to application 1, a first discretionary permit be issued, personal to the applicant, valid until February 2023;

(2)     That, with regard to application 11, a first discretionary permit be issued, personal to the applicant;

(3)     That, with regard to applications 7, 8 and 10, discretionary visitor permit books be issued, personal to the applicants, subject to the standard scheme limits for the number of books that can be issued each year;

(4)     That a decision in respect of application 5 be deferred to the next meeting to allow officers to prepare a report in response to the petition that was received by the Sub-Committee asking for Kendrick Court, Kendrick Road to be included in eligibility to parking Zone 10R (Minute 16(c) refers);

(5)     That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services’ decision to refuse application 2 be upheld and that officers contact the applicant providing information about applying for a Blue Badge;

(6)     That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services’ decision to refuse application 6 be upheld, but that the applicant be offered first refusal of the first or second permit should either be returned by the holders, subject to the applicant supplying the correct documentation;

(7)     That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services’ decision to not waive or reduce the fee for issuing a third discretionary resident permit in respect of application 16 be upheld;

(8)     That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services’ decision to refuse application 19 be upheld and that officers also contact the applicant highlighting the availability of business permits for which they had not yet applied;

(9)     That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services’ decision to refuse applications 3, 4, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 and 21 be upheld.

(Exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 1 and 2).