The Executive Director of Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report seeking approval to procure, award and enter into several new mechanical and electrical (M&E) contracts for planned preventative maintenance and reactive repairs for water treatment (legionella), lift servicing and maintenance, and maintenance of the Trend Building Monitoring System. 

The report noted that these contracts were critical for the Council and necessary to maintain statutory compliance and to ensure that services such as heating, lifts, water systems and automated equipment were kept safe, functional and running at maximum efficiency.  Services supplied by these various contracts were of a specialist nature for which the Council did not directly employ appropriately trained staff and it was custom and practise for organisations the size of local authorities to purchase them via specialist contractors or through a multi-disciplined Facilities Management contractor.  It was therefore proposed to go to market and procure a contract offering best value for each work area via the Westworks Dynamic Purchasing System.  Each contract would be for a term of five years.

Resolved –

That the Executive Director of Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the Lead Councillor for Planning and Assets, the Director of Finance and Assistant Director of Legal & Democratic Services, be authorised to procure, award and enter into the M&E Contracts for planned preventative maintenance and reactive repairs, through the Westworks Dynamic Purchasing System and be given approval to delegate any subsequent contract extension or variation in line with the contract terms for:

(i)       Water Treatment (legionella) for the period 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2027;

(ii)      Lift Servicing and Maintenance for the period 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2027; and

(iii)     Maintenance of the Trend Building Monitoring System for the period 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2027.

This report sets out the projected revenue and capital outturn positions for 2022/23 for both the General Fund and the Housing Revenue Accounts as at the end of Quarter 1 (June 2022), as well as the performance against the measures of success published in the Council’s Corporate Plan.  The following documents were attached to the report:

·     Appendix 1 – Financial Monitoring for Quarter 1

·     Appendix 2 – Capital Programme for Quarter 1

·     Appendix 3 – Corporate Plan Measures for Quarter 1

·     Appendix 4 – Corporate Plan Projects for Quarter 1

·     Appendix 5 - Debt Write-Offs (exempt information)

The report noted that the forecast General Fund (GF) revenue outturn position at the end of Quarter 1 included a projected adverse net variance on service expenditure of £4.058m. This variance was offset by a projected £4.616m positive net variance on Corporate budgets, of which £3.627m related to the unallocated Corporate Contingency, resulting in a projected overall positive net variance of £0.558m.  The forecast adverse variance on services included net pressures totalling £0.564m within Adult Care and Health Services relating to care cost pressures; £1.669m within Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services, primarily relating to ongoing income shortfalls in Car Parking and Planning as an ongoing impact of Covid-19; £1.761m within Brighter Futures for Children (BFfC), relating to pay, inflation and demand pressures; and a total £0.064m across Resources and Chief Executive Services relating to income pressures.  Detailed explanations for these variances were set out in the report. 

The report explained that the service budget pressures were offset by positive net variances within Corporate Budgets, specifically £1.713m on Capital Financing Costs as a result of the 2021/22 Capital Programme outturn position and £3.627m on Corporate Contingencies.  Other Corporate Budgets were forecasting an adverse net variance of £0.724m.  This was primarily due to a current forecast pressure of £0.934m relating to the 2022/23 pay award.  A pay award of 2% was assumed as part of 2022/23 budget setting with additional contingency retained corporately to fund a pay award up to 4%.  The pay offer made in July 2022 was estimated to cost an additional £1.434m above the amount budgeted (including the contingency) across the Council and BFfC. BFfC had included a forecast pressure of £0.500m in their forecast which was prior to the pay award offer announced in July, therefore the difference of £0.934m was included within the Corporate forecast.

The report stated that £1.570m (15%) of budgeted savings had been delivered to date in this financial year, with a further £5.415m (53%) of savings on track to be delivered by March 2023. £2.061m (20%) of savings were currently categorised as non-deliverable (red) and £1.178m (12%) categorised as at risk of delivery. There was therefore a potential impact on the 2023/24 budget should these savings not be deliverable on a recurring basis.  These savings would be reviewed as part of the  2023/24 budget setting and 2023/24-2025/26 Medium Term Financial Strategy processes.

The report also explained that the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) was projecting a positive net variance of £2.505m as at the end of Quarter 1, which resulted in a forecast contribution to HRA reserves of £0.422m.  The General Fund Capital Programme was forecast to spend to budget against a revised budget of £115.980m in 2022/23, and the HRA Capital Programme was forecast to spend to budget against a revised budget of £30.502m 2022/23.  The report sought approval for the revisions to the General Fund and HRA capital programmes and spend approval for a number of schemes.

Resolved –

(1)      That it be noted that:

(a)      The forecast General Fund revenue outturn position as at the end of Quarter 1 was a positive net variance of £0.558m;

(b)      The Housing Revenue Account (HRA) was projecting a positive net variance of £2.505m as at the end of Quarter 1, which resulted in a forecast contribution to HRA reserves of £0.422m;

(c)      £1.570m (15%) of savings had been delivered (blue) to date in this financial year, with a further £5.415m (53%) of savings on track to be delivered (green) by March 2022; £2.061m (20%) of savings were currently categorised as non-deliverable (red) and £1.178m (12%) categorised as at risk of delivery (amber);

(d)      There was a total £4.065m Delivery Fund available for 2022/23 (inclusive of 2021/22 approved carry forwards), at Quarter 1, £2.051m of this funding had been allocated out to approved schemes;

(e)      The General Fund Capital Programme was forecast to spend to budget against a revised budget of £115.980m;

(f)      The HRA Capital Programme was forecast to spend to budget against a revised budget of £30.502m;

(g)      The performance achieved against the Corporate Plan success measures was set out in the report and Appendices 3 and 4;

(2)      That the write-off of debts as set out in Section 8 and Appendix 5 relating to Non-Domestic Rates (£58,562.68) and Housing Benefit Overpayments (£25,944.98) be approved;

(3)      That the amendments to the General Fund Capital Programme (as set out in further detail in Section 12 of the report and Appendix 2), resulting in a revised budget of £124.480m, be approved:

(3)      That the amendments to the HRA Capital Programme (as set out in further detail in Section 12 of the report and Appendix 2), resulting in a revised budget of £30.502m, be approved;

(4)      That spend approval be given for the following Capital Programme Schemes totalling £3.650m: 1 Dunsfold fit out for family contact centre, Katesgrove Community & YOS Refurbishment, Town Hall Equipment, Berkshire Record Office, Digitised TROs, Replacement Vehicles, Bennet Road EV Chargers, Hexagon Lighting and Prospect Park.

The Executive Director of Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report seeking authority to procure and enter new contract arrangements from 1 April 2023 for the provision of support for 50 units of ‘Move-On Homes’ at The Nova Project and 57 Caversham Road to relieve and prevent rough sleeping in Reading.  An Equality Impact Assessment was attached to the report at Appendix A.  The value of grant funding for the schemes contained exempt information under paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A (as amended) of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) and had been provided separately to members of the Committee.

The report noted that the contracts would be funded utilising Rough Sleeping Accommodation Programme (RSAP) grant funding from the Department for Levelling Up, Communities and Housing (DLUHC).  Under DLUHC’s RSAP Round 1 Reading had been awarded three years revenue funding to deliver 50 units of “Move-on Homes” between 2021 and 2024. These units provided an off the streets offer to those rough sleeping, or those who were at risk of rough sleeping having previously and repeatedly been verified. The units had a specific focus on supporting with mental ill-health, substance misuse and preventing re-offending and returns to the streets.  Support to ten “Move-on Homes” at The Nova Project for females with complex needs requiring a 24/7 supportive environment had been delivered under contract with St Mungo’s since 21 December 2020. 40 units of “Move-on Homes” at 57 Caversham Road had been completed in November 2021 and all clients had moved into their self-contained studio with 24/7 on-site staffing presence by January 2022, with support to clients also delivered by St Mungo’s.

The report explained both projects were specifically commissioned to enable a longer period of support with mental ill-health, substance misuse and re-offending than traditional supported accommodation models and that clients could be accommodated for up to 2-3 years before moving on.  Multi-agency work to progress move-on from these units was ongoing with outreach and in-reach support provided by the NHS and Public Health, who commissioned a Health Outreach Liaison Team and Multiple Disadvantage Outreach Team respectively.  These specialist services provided wrap-around health and substance misuse support, aiming to transition clients into core/mainstream support services and independent living.

The report summarised the history of contract arrangements for both sites, which would expire on 31 March 2023, and proposed that an open tender exercise be undertaken and a 12-month contract awarded from 1 April 2023 for a 24/7 staffed environment of accommodation with support at the 50 units of “Move-on Homes” across The Nova Project and 57 Caversham Road.  There was no option to include a contract extension at this stage as the conditions under which RSAP were bid for, and awarded, were for grant to be spent by March 2024.

Resolved –

(1)      That the award of funding from the Rough Sleeping Accommodation Programme (RSAP) 2021-24 to deliver 50 units of “Move-on Homes” in 2023/24 comprising 10 units at The Nova Project and 40 units at 57 Caversham Road be noted;

(2)      That the Assistant Director of Housing and Communities, in consultation with the Lead Councillor for Housing, Director of Finance and Director of Procurement and Commissioning be authorised to:

(a)      undertake the necessary procurement exercise to adhere to RSAP 2021-24 grant funding conditions and

(b)      enter into a contract with the successful tenderer in respect of services to deliver the “Move-on Homes schemes referred to in (1) above, for 12 months from 1 April 2023.

The Executive Director of Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report setting out proposals to make improvements to South Reading Leisure Centre’s Pool Tank and install a waymarked paving route for vision impaired users from Wokingham Road to the new swimming pool at Palmer Park Sports Stadium.  The report also sought authority to agree and sign a Sport England Strategic Facilities Funding agreement, subject to agreeable terms and conditions, of £1.5m towards the costs of the new leisure facilities at Rivermead and Palmer Park.

The report explained that the concrete and reinforcing within the South Reading Leisure Centre pool tank structure was corroding and sought spend approval for £295,000 to make repairs to extend the life of the swimming pool. The repair of this structure was the responsibility of the Council as set out within the Leisure Contract with Greenwich Leisure Limited.  Spend approval was also sought for £36,000 to provide a waymarked pedestrian route for vision impaired users from the bus stop on Wokingham Road to the new swimming pool at Palmer Park Sports Stadium.  Both schemes would be funded from the Small Leisure Schemes in the capital programme.

The report explained that throughout the procurement, planning and build process of new leisure facilities the Council had been working closely with Sport England, and had been invited to submit an expression of interest to their Strategic Facilities Investment Fund in 2021.  A bid for £1m for Rivermead and £500k for Palmer Park had been successful and approval was sought to enter into the funding agreements.

Resolved –

(1)      That spend approval be given of £295,000 for the repair to the structure of the South Reading Leisure Centre Pool Tank and £36,000 to install a waymarked paving route for vision impaired users from Wokingham Road to the new swimming pool at Palmer Park Sports Stadium, funded from the Small Leisure Schemes in the capital programme;

(2)      That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the Director of Finance and the Lead Councillor for Leisure and Culture be authorised to procure and enter contracts for the works to the vision impaired paving route (£36,000) from Wokingham Road to the new swimming pool at Palmer Park Sports Stadium, funded from the Small Leisure Schemes in the capital programme;

(3)      That the Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services, in consultation with the Director of Finance, the Assistant Director for Legal and Democratic Services and the Lead Councillor for Leisure and Culture, be authorised to enter into Sport England funding agreements for Rivermead (£1m) and Palmer Park (£500k) in line with Standing Orders, subject to acceptable terms and conditions.

The Executive Director of Social Care and Health submitted a report seeking approval to join the Berkshire Community Equipment Service (BCES) Partnership commissioning process to commission a new service for provision of equipment and technological products to support people to live as independently as possible at home. 

The report noted that the current contract was held between Nottingham Rehabilitation Service Healthcare (now known as Healthcare Pro) and the lead authority (West Berkshire Council) who acted on behalf of the BCES Partnership made up of all six Berkshire Unitary Authorities and the NHS Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West Integrated Care Board, and NHS Frimley Integrated Care Board.  The current 5-year contract had commenced on 1 April 2017 and been extended for a further two years to 31 March 2024 with no further contract extension available. 

The report proposed that the Council join the Berkshire Community Equipment Service (BCES) Partnership commissioning process to commission a new service in line with the end of the current contract.  It was proposed that the partnership enter into a new contract for an initial term of five years from 1 April 2024 with the ability to extend for another two years.

The report noted that the Berkshire Community Equipment service had been provided for over seven years and was well embedded in professional practice across Berkshire in both health and social care partners.  The service and the provision of equipment played a significant role in keeping people safe and provided assurance to carers thus enabling independent living in people’s own homes and reducing the impact on other more costly care services such as hospital admission, care home or domiciliary care provision.

Resolved –

(1)      That the Council enter into a joint procurement, led by West Berkshire for the provision of a County wide Community Equipment service on behalf of the Berkshire Community Equipment Partnership to go live on 1 April 2024, with a maximum total cost to the Council of £6.486m for a maximum term of 7 years (5 years with the option to extend for up to 2 years);

(2)      That the Executive Director of Social Care and Health, in consultation with the Lead Councillor for Adult Social Care, Director of Finance and Assistant Director of Legal & Democratic Services, be authorised to enter into a contract with West Berkshire Council for the provision of Equipment services post Procurement.

The Executive Director of Social Care and Health submitted a report outlining the requirements of the Fair Cost of Care and Market Sustainability Fund and providing an overview of the actions to date alongside the planned next steps including submission of a Draft Market Sustainability Plan to the Department of Health & Social Care.

The report noted that the government had committed to a national programme of Adult Social Care reforms which would significantly impact on the ‘cost’ of Adult Social Care. The ‘Fair Cost of Care’ element of the reforms required local authorities to undertake a collaborative exercise with Adult Social Care Providers of Home Care (for people aged over 18) and Providers of Nursing and Residential services (for people aged over 65) to determine a ‘Fair Cost of Care’ and to develop a 3-year Market Sustainability Plan.

The report explained that the current care market was such that people who funded their own care often needed to pay much higher rates for their care than people whose care was commissioned by local authorities.  This had long been considered unfair and the government was keen to create a system whereby comparable rates were paid for care, no matter whether the care was funded by the local authority or directly by the person receiving care.  As a consequence of the government’s social care reforms therefore, any care provider currently charging a higher rate to self-funders and/or using self-funder income for the same service to subsidise the true cost of care, might be at financial risk as this was unlikely to be a viable business model. 

The report explained that the government had made available a three-year Fair Cost of Care and Market Sustainability Fund - “the Fund” - to support local authorities in ensuring the ongoing sustainability of their local care markets.  A sum of £384k (of which 25% could be spent on implementation) had been made available to the Council this financial year, with future allocations to be confirmed, noting that current projections suggested that the cost of achieving the fair cost of care was likely to exceed the total amount of funding allocated to Reading.

This report outlined the requirements of the Fund, which included a fair cost of care exercise, and a market sustainability plan, and provided an overview of the actions to date alongside the planned next steps notably a requirement to publish a ‘Fair Cost of Care’ on the Council’s website and submit a Draft Market Sustainability Plan to the Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC) by 14 October 2022.  Failure to submit the requirements of the Fund might mean that a local authority would not have access to future Fund resource.

Resolved –

(1)      That the requirements of the Market Sustainability and Fair Cost of Care Fund 2022/23 and the actions of officers to date to meet the requirements of the Market Sustainability and Fair Cost of Care Fund in its first year (2022/23) be noted;

(2)      That the Executive Director of Adult Social Care and Health, in consultation with the Director of Finance and the Lead Councillor for Adult Social Care, be authorised to approve the submission of both the cost of care exercise and the provisional Market Sustainability Plan to the Department of Health & Social Care by 14 October 2022, and to publish the cost of care exercise outcome on the Council’s website;

(3)      That it be noted that the final Market Sustainability Plan outlining how the Market Sustainability & Fair Cost of Care Funds would be spent in Reading would be submitted and published in February 2023, after local government budgets had been finalised.

The Executive Director of Resources submitted a report setting out at Appendix 1 the updated Risk Management Policy and Procedure for approval.

The report summarised the changes to the Policy which had been updated to reflect best practice and to incorporate a formal Risk Management Procedure.  Under the revised Policy the Council would be operating a more comprehensive risk management system, which will provide more robust governance and hence increased reassurance, and the report set out how this would be achieved.  The revised Policy and Procedure had been endorsed by the Audit & Governance Committee at its meeting on 19 July 2022 (Minute 6 refers) for onward submission to Policy Committee.

Resolved –

          That the updated Risk Management Policy and Procedure attached at Appendix 1 be approved.

The Executive Director of Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report on a proposal to remove library fines for overdue items and other fees.

The report noted that when library services had been made fully digital during the first Covid lockdown in spring 2020 fines had been, by necessity, suspended. Whilst in-person library services had now resumed, the fine suspension had been retained to encourage use and support people returning to the library. Fines previously had been levied per item per day, and in the last full year of charging had raised £22,000. The absence of income from fines had been covered by increased income elsewhere in the library service.

The report explained that the proposal to remove fines for late return of books was intended to remove a barrier to people accessing the library, given that there was evidence that library use was lowest in areas of multiple deprivation.  It would enable more people to benefit from the opportunities arising from library use without any fear of future financial penalties from late return, as well as encourage a return to the service for those who felt they could not use library services as they owed money.  For the same reason it was proposed to remove reservation fees to make all stock freely available to all.

The report stated that the proposal was a part of the Council’s response to the current cost of living crisis and would relieve a financial pressure on residents without impacting on the Council’s budget.  The library service had in recent years concentrated on letting space and the provision of services such as a visa verification service to provide a diversified income base.  These services offered good returns and were complementary to the core provision.  The success of this diversification meant that total income recorded now ran at levels around 150% higher than five years ago, despite a reduction in income from fines and charges.

Resolved –

(1)      That the work undertaken to improve the income position of the Reading library service, increasing the library service’s income to its highest ever level, be noted;

(2)      That the proposal to remove library fines for overdue items and other fees, in line with other local authorities where fines for late return of items on library users had been removed to encourage greater library use, be approved;

(3)      That it be noted that the changes were a measure of support for residents in a time of a cost of living crisis, which had no overall impact on Council financial position, and would also support marketing, developing and increasing use of the service.

The Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report which gave details of a new Caravan Site Licensing Fit & Proper Person Determination policy and Caravan Site Licensing Fit & Proper Person Fees policy for approval.  The following documents were attached to the report:

Appendix RS-1 – Caravan Site Licensing: Fit & Proper Person Determination Policy

Appendix RS-2 – Caravan Site Licensing: Fit & Proper Person Fees Policy

Appendix RS-3 - Climate Impact Assessment

The report explained that The Mobile Homes (Requirement for Manager of Site to be Fit and Proper Person) (England) Regulations 2020 required the manager of residential caravan sites (referred to as relevant protected sites) to be a fit and proper person to the satisfaction of the local authority, and made it an offence for an occupier of land to cause or permit any part of their land to be used as a relevant protected site without such a fit and proper person, among other offences.  Licence fees for caravan site activities would be set locally and must be applied to the administration and enforcement costs, only.

The report further explained that those applying to be on the register of fit and proper persons were required to show that they were able to secure the proper management of the site; demonstrating, amongst other things, a history of compliance with the site licence, a good history of maintenance of the site, that they had a sufficient level of competence to manage the site and that they had not been convicted of a number of offences the regulations deemed relevant.  Following a successful application, a person may be added to the fit and proper register for a period of no longer than five years. The Council might also decide to include a person on the register subject to conditions if it would only be satisfied that the relevant person would meet the fit and proper requirement if the condition(s) were complied with.  The Council was required to publish a fees policy if it wished to charge fees for these applications and the Council would be charging a fee to cover the costs incurred in the administration and enforcement of the scheme.

The report noted Caravan site licensing was a very small area of work in Reading, with the Council only having issued four site licences.  All site owners had submitted their applications to be on the register of fit and proper persons, which would be determined following agreement of the policy.

Resolved –

That the new Caravan Site Licensing Fit & Proper Person Determination policy and Caravan Site Licensing: Fit & Proper Person Fees policy, as attached to the report at Appendix RS-1 and Appendix RS-2, respectively, be approved for implementation with immediate effect.

Further to Minute 3 of the meeting held on 22 June 2021, the Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report asking the Committee to consider whether an Unmet Demand Survey should be carried out during autumn 2022 and whether it would be appropriate to amend the current limiting policy approach to hackney carriagenumbers.  The following documents were attached to the report:

Appendix i: - Email to and reply from the RTA;

Appendix ii – Email to and replies from drivers;

Appendix iii – Climate Impact Assessment.

The report explained that a moratorium on the issue of new hackney carriage vehicle licences had been implemented in March 2009 and had been maintained ever since, following analysis of unmet demand surveys completed in 2012, 2015 and 2018, each of which confirmed there was no significant underlying unmet demand for hackney carriages inReading.  Officers had been in the process of arranging a new survey in accordance with the Taxi requirements of Section 16 of the Transport Act 1985 and the Department for Transport and Private Hire Vehicle Licensing: Best Practice Guidance 2010 (Sections 45 to 51) when the Covid19 pandemic had caused the country to go into three national lockdowns which had made it impossible to continue with the implementation of asurvey.

The report set out guidance that had been produced by the Department for Transport which stated:

“Section 16 of the Transport Act 1985 does not specify the frequency of the unmet demand assessment, but the Department’s Best Practice Guidance issued in 2010 suggested this is conducted every three years.  Though the decision as to when an unmet demand survey is conducted remains that for a licensing authority, we are aware that we are in a very unusual situation at present; while this continues it would seem highly unlikely that there would be significant unmet demand for taxis.  We would expect unmet demand surveys to be conducted once travel levels return to more normal levels or if concerns are raised by the trade orpublic.”

The report noted that if a survey was to be conducted in the current circumstances, it was highly unlikely the results would be a true reflection of the trade in Reading or of levels of demand for hackney carriagevehicles, and therefore proposed that the survey be delayed until such time as a more normal level of usage wasapparent.

The report explained that no public consultation had taken place but comments had been requested from the trade organisations. The response from the Reading Taxi Association (RTA) had agreed to delay the Unmet Demand Survey by 12 months and confirmed that, at the moment, there were only an estimated 93 HCVs working the ranks out of the216 licensed HCVs, and that carrying out a survey now would be unfair on rental drivers.  Asif Rashid representing the RTA attended the meeting, addressed the Committee, and confirmed to the Committee that the RTA agreed the survey should be delayed until 2022.

Resolved –

(1)      That the Unmet Demand Survey not be implemented in 2022 due to the current financial hardship that was affecting the Reading Borough Council Hackney Carriage trade and that it be delayed until October 2023 when it was hoped that the current financial difficulties due to the Covid 19 pandemic had eased following the return of business to thetrade;

(2)      That the current policy of not issuing any further hackney carriage licences outside the agreed number of 216, be retained pending a review following the next survey in 2023.

The Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report asking the Committee to consider whether to approve and recommend an increase in hackney carriage fares.  The following documents were attached to the report:

Appendix I-   Current and proposed table of fares

Appendix II-  Letter from the chair Reading Taxi Association

Appendix II-  National fares table

The report explained that from time to time the hackney carriage trade requested that the Council increase the amount they could charge their customers for transportation to their desired destinations.  The most recent request had been considered by the Licensing Applications Sub-Committee 3 at its meeting held on 6 February 2020 (Minute 21 refers), when a reduction in the yardage for daytime fares to 133 yards had been agreed.  There had been no increase in fare for the night-time tariff.  The report also noted that the current charge available to drivers if a customer soiled the taxi was £40 for the inside and £10 for the exterior.  These charges had not changed for many years and did not reflect the clean-up costs and time lost by drivers.

The report added that the chair of the Reading Taxi Association (RTA) had written to the licensing section requesting the fare rise and a change to the cost for cleaning their taxis when customers had soiled the taxi.  The proposal was to increase the flag drop by £1.00 on both daytime and night-time tariffs, an increase from £2.60 to £3.60 for the Day tariff and from £3.60 to £4.60 for the Night-time tariff.  The Flag Drop was the standard hire fare a customer would pay before commencing their journey and included the first 300 yards (274.32 meters) or 2 minutes 36 seconds of the journey.  The proposal also included an increase in soiling charges to £70 for inside the taxi and £25 for the outside of the taxi.

Asif Rashid, representing the RTA, and drivers Chris Avery, Asad Sheikh and Imran Ali attended the meeting and addressed the Committee on this item.  Correspondence from drivers, relating to the proposed increase and the process by which it had been submitted to the Council, had also been circulated to members of the Committee.

Resolved –

(1)      That the Assistant Director of Planning, Transport and Public Protection be recommended to implement an increase of £1 in the flag-drop for both daytime and night-time tariffs, subject to no objections being received as a result of advertising the proposed increase in a local newspaper;

(2)      That any objections received during the consultation be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration;

(3)      That the Assistant Director of Planning, Transport and Public Protection be recommended to implement an increase in the soiling charge for cleaning taxis to £70 for inside the taxi and £25 for the outside of the taxi.

The Executive Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report asking the Committee to consider and approve updated criteria for the allocation of Hackney Carriage Licence Plates as and when they might become available. A copy of the current criteria, resolved by the Licensing Applications Committee on 4 November 2015 (Minute 3 refers), was attached to the report at Appendix I.

The report highlighted the Licensing team’s recommendation that two changes be made to the Hackney Carriage Vehicle Licence Plate Criteria. A copy of the proposed new criteria was attached to the report at Appendix II.

The first proposed change sought to increase the length of time that prospective Hackney Carriage Proprietors’ licence holders would need to have held a Reading Borough Council Hackney Carriage Driver’s licence from eight (8) consecutive years to 12 consecutive years prior to them showing an expression of interest.

The second proposal required that applicants who successfully met the criteria and were eligible for a Proprietors’ licence must provide a brand new ULEV or brand new fully electric purpose-built hackney carriage vehicle for licensing within three months of being permitted to apply for a Hackney Carriage Vehicle licence or the Hackney Carriage Proprietors’ licence might be issued to any other person who showed an expression of interest and met the current criteria.

Asif Rashid, Chairman of the Reading Taxi Association, and Imran Ali, a local taxi driver, both addressed the Committee.

Resolved –

(1)      That the length of time that prospective Hackney Carriage Proprietors’ licence holders would need to have held a Reading Borough Council Hackney Carriage Driver’s licence remain at eight (8) consecutive years prior to them showing an expression of interest.

(2)      That the Hackney Carriage Vehicle Licence Plate Criteria be amended so that applicants who successfully met the criteria and were eligible for a Proprietors’ licence must provide a brand new ULEV or brand new fully electric purpose-built hackney carriage vehicle for licensing within three months of being permitted to apply for a Hackney Carriage Vehicle licence or the Hackney Carriage Proprietors’ licence might be issued to any other person who showed an expression of interest and met the current criteria.

Further to Minute 5 of the meeting held on 12 July 2022, the Director for Economic Growth and Neighbourhood Services submitted a report asking the Committee to consider whether to reapprove and recommend the proposed increase in hackney carriage fares for the year 2022-23 after objections had been received during the statutory consultation period.

The following documents were appended to the report:

•        Appendix I    Table of fares up to the hearing 12/07/2022 & Table of fares as agreed on 12/07/2022;

•        Appendix II   Letter from the chair Reading Taxi Association;

•        Appendix III  Objections to the fare increase;

•        Appendix IV  Objectors further reasoning and proposal;

•        Appendix V   Chart Showing cost of journeys over two miles;

•        Appendix VI  September issue of the Private Hire Taxi Monthly (PHTM);

•        Appendix VII Equality Impact Assessment.

The report explained that, following representations made by the RTA, Licensing Applications Committee, on 12 July 2022, had resolved to grant  a £1 increase in the flag drop on both tariffs 1 (daytime) and 2 (night-time) from £2.60 to £3.60 and £3.60 to £4.60 respectively and to raise the cleaning charges after soiling to £70 inside the taxi and £25 outside.

The report went on to explain that, as required under Section 65 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, a statutory consultation had taken place between 20 July 2022 and 3 August 2022 with an advert being placed in a local paper and the details also published on the RBC website detailing the proposed fare rises. During the consultation period four written objections and a petition against the fare rise from 97(92) Hackney Carriage drivers had been received by the Council.

The report explained that a number of Hackney Carriage drivers had stated that they had not been consulted fully by the RTA, and that the RTA had not been transparent with its members about the issue. The objectors did not agree to the fare increase in the form that was presented to the Licensing Applications Committee on 12 July 2022. The objectors provided further reasoning for their objections along with an alternative proposal for fare rises which was attached to the report at Appendix IV. The report also noted that no objections had been received concerning the proposed increase to the soiling charge.

Mr Asif Rashid, Chairman of the Reading Taxi Association, and Mr Imran Ali, a local hackney carriage driver, both attended the meeting with colleagues and addressed the Committee. The RTA spoke in favour of the original fare rise proposal, whilst Mr Ali opposed the original proposal and spoke in favour the alternative proposal.

The Committee indicated that, if the Trade wished to propose future fare rises, it would be sympathetic to reviewing fares on a sixth-monthly basis rather than on the current yearly basis.

Resolved –

(1)      That the decision to recommend that the Assistant Director of Planning, Transport and Public Protection implement an increase of £1 in the flag-drop for both daytime and night-time tariffs be upheld.

(2)      That the decision to recommend that the Assistant Director of Planning, Transport and Public Protection implement an increase in the soiling charge for cleaning taxis to £70 for inside the taxi and £25 for the outside of the taxi be upheld.